Key Takeaways
China’s e-CNY, the country’s central bank digital currency, has grown rapidly at home through pilot programs and retail adoption, but it still struggles to gain traction beyond mainland borders due to capital controls and limited convertibility. At the same time, a new path is opening.
Beijing is weighing yuan-backed stablecoins to push the renminbi (RMB, China’s currency) into global payments and trade. The result looks less like a replacement and more like a double-back strategy.
The e-CNY remains the domestic rail. Beijing is signaling that it supports using regulated yuan-pegged stablecoins, and Hong Kong has already passed clear rules to allow them.
Together, this shows China is serious about using stablecoins for cross-border trade and offshore payments.
This article explains why the e-CNY, China’s central bank digital currency, may not be enough on its own to globalize the yuan and how yuan-backed stablecoins could complement it.
+76
China’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) has reached scale at home: over 180 million wallets have been opened and cumulative transactions hit ¥7.3 trillion ($1.02 trillion) by mid-2024.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub reports that the e-CNY is already technically ready for cross-border settlement through projects like Multiple Central Bank Digital Currency Bridge (mBridge), which reached the minimum viable product (MVP) stage in mid-2024.

Yet the RMB’s share of international payments was only 2.88–2.89% in mid-2025, ranking sixth globally behind the US dollar (USD), euro (EUR), British pound (GBP), Japanese yen (JPY), and Canadian dollar (CAD). This shows that while e-CNY works at home, it has not broken into global usage at scale.
China’s e-CNY is expanding across cities and services. It runs on a state-managed infrastructure with offline payment support, tiered digital wallets, and no need for a commercial bank account for small balances. However, adoption remains uneven in everyday life.
The currency is used in 1.3+ million scenarios, including utilities, transportation, and government services, with adoption boosted by “red envelope” giveaways and lottery campaigns.
However, surveys and local reports show that many users still prefer Alipay and WeChat Pay for daily purchases because of their convenience, rewards programs, and deep integration into China’s retail ecosystem.
As a result, e-CNY usage spikes during government campaigns but often falls back once incentives end, highlighting the challenge of turning trial use into lasting behavioral change.
Beijing’s roadmap for yuan-backed stablecoins appears to go beyond simply issuing new tokens.
If successful, this framework could turn Hong Kong into the key liquidity hub for digital RMB assets, enabling exporters and global suppliers to settle invoices in RMB with near-instant finality.
Hong Kong’s Policy Statement 2.0 on the Development of Digital Assets (June 26, 2025) and the HKMA’s work on tokenising trade finance highlight its push to integrate digital assets with the real economy, positioning the city as a testing ground for cross-border RMB settlement.
That would still be far smaller than USD stablecoins, but large enough to start shifting payment flows in Asia-Pacific.
China’s push for yuan-backed stablecoins is not happening in isolation. Major fintech firms, e-commerce giants, and regulators are shaping how this market will grow. Each player brings different strengths, from building the tech rails to setting the rules that make global adoption possible.
Ant International (the overseas arm of Ant Group) is preparing to apply for a license in Hong Kong under the new Stablecoins Ordinance (effective from 1 August 2025) to issue fiat-referenced stablecoins.
The company is also exploring stablecoin licenses in Singapore and Luxembourg.
Ant’s interest signals a major shift from China’s earlier strict stance on crypto, indicating that large fintechs are positioning themselves as issuers under the coming regulatory framework.
JD.com is actively lobbying the PBOC for approval for offshore yuan-pegged stablecoins, especially for issuance in Hong Kong, as part of its broader push for yuan internationalization.
Its fintech arm “Coinlink” has already made progress in testing stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.
JD.com also proposes launching in free-trade zones, to expand usage beyond Hong Kong toward cross-border trade corridors.
PBOC is central in shaping the roadmap, deciding which entities may be licensed, what reserve-backing and redemption requirements will apply, and how to ensure regulatory guardrails (AML, risk, capital controls) are maintained.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has already put into effect the Stablecoins Ordinance as of August 1, 2025, establishing licensing, supervision, and AML/CFT guidelines for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers.
Meanwhile, Shanghai is being developed as a domestic hub (including an international digital yuan centre) for trials/pilots of yuan-backed stablecoins and related infrastructure under state policy direction.
Before looking at the road ahead, it helps to see how e-CNY and yuan-backed stablecoins differ in purpose and design. This table summarizes the key contrasts between the two instruments.
| Feature | e-CNY | Yuan-backed stablecoins |
| Issuer | People’s Bank of China | Licensed private issuers under HKMA rules |
| Technology | Centralized, two-tiered system | Public blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, etc.) |
| Primary use | Domestic retail payments, government services | Cross-border trade, offshore liquidity, DeFi |
| Anonymity | “Managed anonymity” (small transactions partly private, large ones traceable) | Permissionless access, higher privacy on public ledgers |
| Regulatory goal | Enhance domestic oversight and financial stability | Support RMB internationalization while preserving capital controls |
| Adoption focus | Mainland users and state-driven programs | Exporters, foreign firms, global investors |
These distinctions show why China is pursuing both tools simultaneously: e-CNY for domestic control and yuan-backed stablecoins for global reach.
Looking forward, China’s focus will be on proving that both systems can work together without undermining monetary control. Regulators will watch how yuan-backed stablecoins perform in pilot trade settlements and whether they attract global users.
At the same time, e-CNY adoption efforts will likely shift toward encouraging repeat consumer use rather than relying on short-term giveaways. If successful, this combined approach could gradually increase the RMB’s share in international payments and strengthen its position in Asia-Pacific trade flows.
China’s digital currency strategy is no longer centered on a single tool. The e-CNY has proven successful in scaling domestic pilots, reaching 180 million wallets and trillions of yuan in transactions.
However, it struggles to displace entrenched private payment platforms in everyday retail use. Its main strength remains as a state-backed infrastructure for public services, welfare disbursements, and government-driven campaigns.
The push for yuan-backed stablecoins signals a pragmatic policy shift aimed at the global stage. By licensing private issuers, anchoring reserves in onshore assets, and piloting in Hong Kong and Shanghai, Beijing is creating a parallel digital channel that targets cross-border trade and offshore liquidity without loosening capital controls.
Together, the e-CNY and yuan-backed stablecoins form a two-track approach: domestic oversight paired with international flexibility. Their combined success could raise the RMB’s role in global finance, reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar, and reshape how international trade is settled in Asia.
Yes. They are designed to facilitate cross-border payments, making them more accessible to global firms than e-CNY. No. They will be regulated with redemption and flow monitoring to preserve China’s capital account policies. Yes. HKMA rules require full backing with cash or equivalents to ensure redemption at par. No. e-CNY remains the primary domestic rail for retail payments and government services.